Latest News

Buy-to-let mortgages stable despite overall market slowing

13 November 2019

Latest data has revealed an overall slowdown in mortgages despite the stability in the buy-to-let market with an expected further growth of 1 per cent in the next quarter. Read More...

Council of Dragons to advise Government on proptech

11 November 2019

Housing Minister Esther McVey has unveiled a new expert advisory council dedicated to the digital transformation of the property sector. The new Proptech dragons will advise ministers on how to support and grow the sector further, making it easier and cheaper to plan, build and buy new homes. Read More...

Internal communications lapse led to huge fine for estate agent

07 November 2019

Agents are encouraged to review their internal communications procedures, after a prominent Reading estate agent was fined for failing to disclose that a flat was cladded with Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) until minutes after the sale was completed. Read More...

Ban for solicitor who enabled £62,000 overpayment on property

Wednesday 16 October 2019

A solicitor who allowed his client to overpay for a property has been struck off by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.

Milan Patel was sole director of ALD Legal Solicitors in Harrow when he was instructed by a resident of Saudi Arabia to purchase a UK property on his behalf. 

According to the judgment, a sub-sale transaction took place on the day of completion – the property was transferred from the seller to a firm called HB Consultants Ltd for £438,000. The client, unaware of this, then bought the property from HB Consultants for £500,000. 

The tribunal found that Patel’s ‘state of knowledge of the facts at the material time was that he was well aware that HB Consultants Limited purchased the property for £438,000 then immediately resold it to [his client] for £500,000’.

Patel also had a commercial relationship with HB, who was Patel’s business partner and a client of the law firm, the tribunal found. It stated that Patel had shown a ‘flagrant disregard’ for his client’s best interests. It found his conduct to have been dishonest. 

The tribunal found, on separate allegations, that Patel misappropriated client money in 13 improper payments, totalling £277,000, causing a shortfall in the client account. 

It also found that Patel failed to comply with money laundering regulations when dealing with his Saudi client, whose place of residence should have merited more due diligence checks. The judgment states that the client did not supply any identification documents until four days before the completion of the property sale. 

Patel, who did not attend the tribunal, was struck off and ordered to pay costs of £27,412. The tribunal said his conduct was driven by ‘personal financial gain’ and was ‘planned, premeditated and concealed over a protracted period of time’.

Anti-Money Laundering Resources  

Propertymark has a range of resources to ensure agents are aware of, and able to meet, their legal obligations on AML.

AML resources