Latest News

Propertymark urges Government to streamline redress with ombudsman portal

16 April 2018

NAEA Propertymark and ARLA Propertymark have submitted a joint response to the Government’s consultation on strengthening consumer redress in the housing market by calling for an ombudsman portal for housing related complaints, with one ombudsman for private housing and another for social housing. Read More...

Everybody needs good neighbours!

13 April 2018

When it comes to moving home, there are a number of reasons to relocate - a new job, a growing family perhaps, but what about nightmarish neighbours? Read More...

GDPR - it's more than just consent

12 April 2018

When it comes to General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) it's easy to get hung up on the idea of consent - but there are five other legal bases which organisations can use to process personal data. Read More...

Research highlights need for housing for older people

10 April 2018

Recently published research by Sheffield Hallam University and the University of Sheffield has examined the issue of older people's housing and provided new insights into areas with fast growing ageing populations. Read More...

 

 

Agents’ Mutual v Gascoigne Halman

Thursday 13 July 2017

The Competition Appeal Tribunal has found in favour of Agents’ Mutual in relation to the competition issues arising in the legal proceedings with Gascoigne Halman.

The long-running case between the online property portal and Connells owned estate agency concerned Agents’ Mutual alleging breach of contract by Cheshire based Gascoigne Halman, by not adhering to its controversial 'one other portal only' rule. The rule dictates agents listing properties on OnTheMarket can only advertise on either Rightmove or Zoopla, but not both.

The Competition Appeal Tribunal rejected Gascoigne Halman’s arguments that OnTheMarket's ‘one other portal’ rule was anti-competitive, saying that the rule was in fact part of arrangements which were pro-competitive. The tribunal also found that “the rule did not form part of a wider concerted practice to ‘boycott’" its rivals and Gascoigne Halman's argument was not valid on that account.

At a case management conference, Gascoigne Halman were ordered to pay an interim sum of £1.24 million within a fortnight, and the funds that Agents’ Mutual had to pay into court last year in the event of its losing the case are being returned. The Honourable Mr Justice Marcus Smith said the figure represented the minimum cost that would be incurred.

As part of their contractual agreement, Gascoigne Halman must continue to list on OnTheMarket and pay its listing fees, as well as comply with the ‘one other portal’ rule. 

Paul Smith, CEO of Spicerhaart and an OnTheMarket member company, said:

"This judgment draws a line under this protracted matter and allows Agents' Mutual, and its member agencies, to move forward together.

"Indeed, the judgment confirmed that rather than being anti-competitive, Agents' Mutual has had the opposite effect, providing crucial competition to the major portals.

“This case underlines the need for all proper estate agencies, irrespective of size, to join force in further developing OnTheMarket as a leading portal which works for them and retains the value of listings and fees within the industry."

Ian Springett, chief executive of OnTheMarket, commented:

"The two largest incumbent portals continue to use agents’ hard-won property listings and their ever-increasing fees to generate super profits for their shareholders at the expense of their agent customers and they are defending their duopoly position vigorously. However, with an excellent online platform, the sustained support of thousands of high quality agents and a highly experienced team, OnTheMarket.com is well positioned to create a genuine alternative market-leading portal for agents and consumers alike.

"We are pleased that the Tribunal has confirmed the position maintained consistently by our Board that Agents’ Mutual’s strategy for entry to the portals market has been pro-competitive both in object and effect and that the business is operating within the law. The Tribunal has dismissed the challenge from Gascoigne Halman that Agents’ Mutual and its Members have behaved illegally or anti-competitively."

A spokesperson for Zoopla said: "This outcome doesn’t change anything as far as we’re concerned. We welcome competition based on innovation and performance."